Issue 4

April 1 March / dahil ale Seah arsed tian ee i = sr at ro tae anal oe ans ms : si a ao settee a WV) = & oO © Cc Lay) O — = ® Le) Cc @ © ® OD Cc — © ta QQ = ® VY) vy) <i ® ie — oO ape Cc O ~ O = Oo oO _ £ er L fax 231-5746 a f " ee Ottawa, Ontario, KiR 721 Published by the Canadian institute for Political Integrity (S13) 231-7034 Box 56097, 407 Laurier Ave. WW. Fourth Edition The — table by the Canadian sutute for Political Inteant Sox 56097, 407 Launer hue Ww Ottawa. Ontario, K1iR 72771 (613) 231-7034: fax 231-5746 Fourth Edition eal Ts eae Cee h ee 2%, rae CO Oy WV VS yy Pes Sie I = i | An introduction to the Assembly of Independent Canadians 1995 B.C. NATIVE STANDOFF RCMP BRASS TRIED TO KILL ELDERS Nativ by Glen EP Kealey More than 100 members of the RC ‘MP will be called to testify at the trial of Mr. William Jones Ignace. the Ssixty-three year old seed grower who was a leader of the 1995 native Standoff at Gustafsen Lake. No testimony will shock traditional Canadians more than that of Allan G. Soneff, (32987) a corporal from the Kamloops detachment. Glen EP Kealey acquired copies of ihe police “will-say statements” when he agreed to join Wolverine’s (ignace) defense team, as an “agent” a C— = a ee a eT = ee ee Se f/OWS Fs wlar Cc pf SonetyY stares he will say when he resn fies. “On the 1 [th of September, 1995, we were deployed, that is the Kamloops ERT team. to an area on the 1000 Rd.” “Our deployment to this area was to contain any movement of the Natives that would be or were attempting to ¢ negotia , go tors set up to be shot when RCMP bosses orchestrated violent crossfire come out of the camp and also to monitor their activities. ~ “At approximately, oh I would say it would have been 1330 hrs, 1:30 mn the afternoon, we were advised that a group of elders were coming into the camp, driving a green Chrysler van, in hopes of settling the con- frontation in a peaceful way.” “At approximately 13.30 hrs. the ve- hicle was pointed out coming into the area on the 1000 Rd. at kilometre twenty I think. At this point two male Natives, both armed, were seen col- lecting, it appeared to be water, bot- tles in the back of a red pickup. In the back wie irlick Was a yellow dog.” “At approximately quarter to two the vehicle, the red truck that is, moved out of the encampment and started proceeding out on Lakeshore Rd., to the 1000 Rd., that is from the camp. The green van (Elders) still contin- ued and we were notified by furthet check points through ERT personne! that the van was coming Our Wa) also. EUTHANASIA: NEW WORLD ORDER DEPOPULATION STRATEGY ? called Report from Iron Mountain. Fear is the main ingredient. by Glen EP Keale First it began with war, alcohol, air pollution and slave labour. [Then they added pharmaceuticals, marketed with the aid of slow motion medical research controlled by their rich foundations. Later, they followed that up by birth control, abortions and assisied suicide. be promoting “mceless eaters be AS become surplus to elifes, both in numbers and form. Most people must believe they will only require two billion ‘> Could euthanasia the next thing they have in mind? technology permits, humans removed, they say. The controllers - " ln — > — ie nal na ra, ee N At approximately ten to two it was es dispatched by manage...., or by the |= bosses, to take the truck if they ie Gey es could and they had the green light | Read Alert. to take the truck. The van (Elders) @2223 was still continuing apparently and ee we had no other direction to stop © the van or impede the elders from going in’. == “As the elders passed us in the green fos van On our point it was only a matter | : of a few minutes that we heard an explosion and gunfire”. There it is. The RCMP brass had $3223. encouraged a group of local native #3 Ss eager the “Defenders of the Land”, to vist the cnimp and attempt to resolve the stand-off peacefully . Meanwhile, the RCMP leadership or- ie¢ - ~nada'< es ay ~tlic dered the military to place an explo- §= Eee ee Sos sive land mine (bomb) on the road + Ecyee ‘THE the Native defenders used to collect 35333 water. This road is the same one the Native Elders were expected to turn onto later, when they would arrive at the barricade to be picked up by the red truck Continued on page 2 7 daily that as as a Canadian society we are broke. Nothing could be further from the truth. The Canadian debt, one trillion dollars if you add up federal, provincial, municipal and school board debt, was engineered by the current controller (Rothschilds, the direct descendents of the Lion of Egypf). If one can get beyond the illusion, one will realize the real purpose of government. It is to waste resources so as to create fear of poverty, especially within the middle-class. slaves to carry out What will be next in the N.O.W.'s never ending bag of dirty tricks? Afterall the plan is not new. If was first assembled millenniums ago, by the SPHINX (the lion King of kings who sits atop the Legislateur in Victoria, B.C. His phallic symbol stands proudly on the lawn <an obelisk>, a monument to the thief who first stole land from the Natives. Nearby, the lion also holds the world in his hands, on the Royal Bank logo). The kit was designed to help the puppeteer and his puppets depopulate our earth of its War people until John F. Kennedy gave the elites a new and more efficient plan to control the world. It is all laid out in a report published in the mid 1960's their orders in the near future. Humans must, they say, be In any event, even with this debt, our natural resources alone total more than two thousand trillion dollars. So much for being broke. if we can get beyond our illusions we will at last identify the real purpose of our type of government. Today the government of B.C. is doing reconfigured through a new process of genetic manipulation known as eugenics. Tall people to pick apples, short ones for mining gold. was the preferred way of culling It is intended fo waste resources so as to create the fear of poverty, especially within the middle-class. everything it can to increase the authority of the Public Trustee. Insurance companies also are demanding that they be allowed to participate in the home care industry, Imagine if you were old and vulnerable and under the direct control of an insurance company that no longer wishes to continue paying your benefits, or, of a government who no longer collects taxes from you and doesn’t care to continue paying you your old age pension. When we are afraid we do what we are told and don’t ask questions, even when things we are told by the controlled media don’t make sense. A cood example is THE BIG LIE promoted by the media. They tell us = i x 7 - ws. ety ome ey Pa Se ee ee ee oe jor ee ee oe ve Ge gy er UT Be TP ~}: = + Rie ale a i ine Ce aks , . ' goto tere rrr ee c ' "ha gt ol Se Segui aetrat i eye ee oe a ee ¥ aveeteavre&e?® +‘; eareeeareseeon ae That ss a ve ar ah at a gu a Y = TL LLEASALAAAAAAA, E bb bf 1 i ee This tasAsAL SS reer ee: we ee we | VERT VLAIVE LCRA ABA AAR SS Lk he eT eerie ge deeeae eee ee Cererr V2 co oe el a hk ‘ ; ACRTRAALS Lk . ‘ ' I oe ey ee ee) 0 A Sag eee ca Fe Fate peat a l a] NEWS RCMP BRASS DOUBLE- CROSSED SERVILE NATIVE ELDERS commit suicide, no | natte Ve ofa : by Ann Keale method is used (for example GFN (TA ae RCMP snipers were positioned in the y y gave the person requestin 4 the : an bush, aiming their rifles down the ‘The Province of British Columbia, assistance an overdose of pills or Tt is. most important f _ — hi place where they 4, November 5, 1993, gave took a gun and shot this person), Co umbians | to not eee o red Enc oe prosecutors of this province in either case you would be Victor ol nally desake Oe Ass ia ‘suicide help’ guidelines. These charged with murder. of the truck, was the place the local guidelines clearly demonstrate that Native Elders were expected to arrive the “law” has now been extended : at the camp barricade. to include, not only those who Government fast tracked suffer physically but also those euthanasia laws through the legislative assembly even though jn ec they KNEW that there would be ONLY ones allowed to issu amendments added AFTER the annuities. One can certainly | | ss 2S J a 4 2” il ~ ae —ours ns - f . 3 ‘ -God help those vulnerable people “health care providers who happen to fall under the The four new ‘DEATH BILLS’ of jt means the insurance | ompa ry. control of the Public Trustee. In BC are: BILL 48 - 1993 Would it not be in the companie: Secondly, the dust raised by the ex- fact, it means that the 6,000 ‘REPRESENTATION best interest to terminate a life of plosion on the dirt road covered the ‘mentally challenged’ people AGREEMENT ACT’ ; BILL 49 a senior in order to terminate a me route for the two Defenders in under the care of the Public - 1993 ‘ADULT GUARDIAN- prearranged monthly payment the truck who, after jumping in the JTyystee are now prime targets, lake, swam back to the camp under a . ie ACT’ ; BILL 50 - 1995 obligation by the insurance hail of bullets. Not to be denied, the that is, once the ‘machinery’ is in ‘PUBLIC GUARDIAN AND company to the senior citizen? = RCMP snipers shot the yellow dog as TRUSTEE ACT’; BILL 51 - 1993 ; he ran dazed from the explosion. ‘HEALTH CARE (CONSENT) Former MI-6 Agent (British Spy) P The Criminal Code of Canada Act AND CARE FACILITY Dr. John Coleman, in his best _ Following the stand-off RCMP (CCCA) says that a person is (ADMISSION) ACT. seller ‘Conspirators' Hierarchy brass had the gall to charge the 63 allowed to commit suicide in which relates what would happer ‘to year old pensioner and Native seed ever fashion he/she chooses and Sr eee : | as : ses In 1994, tt : -elj | Wi T) grower, Wolverine, with attempted this person will tatsbe dab oles eee eg a General core elite under a ONE WORLD Continued from page I a= On July 21, 1993 the NDP Almost everything went off accord- who are the most vulnerable of all ing to the RCMP plan, that is, except _ the mentally challenged. for two details. First, the Native El- ders were a little late getting to the . : ware barricade. Upon hearing the explo- What does this mean? It means Bill’s 3rd reading. -sion and subsequent gunfire one vis- iting Elder suffered a heart attack. aad : x place. _—_— ro 1 > = —a murder for trying to stop the po” having committed a crime. allowed for “assisted suicide” even most relevant statements fo lows: ae the two swimmers yr ,Wever, the CCCA also states though, when one reads all four 1) “Euthanasia for the terminally. paces that if a person assists another to Bills it is evident that the N.D.P.’s_ ill and the ~ aged shall be “Death Bills” allow “health care compulsory”; an 1 2) “At e ast 4 providers” to pull the plug. less e eliminated by the year 2050 7) Who are we? ce ELITE LICENCE TO KILL you. If you have reason to fear ent system of gove rnme! at = oy We are the Canadian Institute for Political Integrity (CIPD), a non-profit organisation dedicated to bringing about a democratic and sovereign Canada. We believe this can only be done by exposing the corruption in our political system to such a degree that citizens will come to the conclusion that the system itself must be changed, and not ‘n the usual way. What distinguishes us then please contact the Kealeys Cote B.C.’s Health Care Provider ‘uidelines (Bill 49) are set to give and join in the Assembly of ominous powers to hospital Independent Canadians and the “administrators” or health care fight to save Canada from the “providers”. The Bills give these descent into slavery that Is yeing power to decide imposed upon the entire world, a Se aaa Sit people the ' ‘ane : ee ef Fs J —t Ss from other groups is not our analysis of FUE AE MOTT FEA A te wrong: it} rusaders for political integrity: Glen Kealey an what's wrong; it is the fact that we Crusaesiey (formerly Shelley Ann Clark) risked it ie alone offer a solution that does a alt —now it's your tum to stand up for Canes : a “ fe lem, but oin the cross-country caravan to Parliament Ml aS rely age 7 Bie Eee ie and take paft in the setting up of a democratic “ If you received this paper in the mail it | Statement of p ur p OSE ineans hig of eat pra thought Ae | Paper' might be interested in this new entity an | —- ee ge oes placed your pame on our “ne shot” THE KEALEY PAPER WISHES TO APOLOGIZE TO ALL] , O recel ; a _ api te the psa ae a you want to stay on our mailing lis, please OUR SUBSCRIBERS FOR THE TARDINESS SUFFERED ependent Canadians F send in the order form on the back Cover, eee -aravan to create the basis for IN PUBLISHING ITS THIRD AND FOURTH EDITION . ye democracy. This paper will provide an Pobiehed moet Aha ser . pe Sean din ty or Politi ae venue West ONMPTITER media monopoly refuses to SS | OMPUTER ae ledge, We will attempt 0 PU, en Canad aap ee WITHIN OUR BUDGET WERE THE MAIN REASONS this information in context, showing swelve issues, payable to CIPI. $100 elsewhere. FOR THE DELAY. ALSO, WE WERE NOT HAPPY WITE into th Id order and Half of the ill go to the Assembly of , — where it fits into the wor ai of the revenue wi ae THE OU ALITY OF THE PRINTIN G OF 1s : iE TH uF what you can do. The Kealey Paper \s pendent Canadians. also a forum for debate — on the merits AND HAVE ORDERED A REPRINT. is ee o and shortcomings of proposed solutions, on which groups and public figures are Ct scully on thesideof Canadians and Nevis hank) FINALLY, ISSUE FOUR COVERS MARCH AND ich are merely puppets of the monied mea és 1996. YOUR SUBSCRIPTION WILL E eRYTE enw sts, and pe best to set up the Production staf: Ann Kealey, Glen EP Kealey ej TION WILL BE EA . - new political vehicle to replace maga am Brock AN ADDITIONAL MON nae | Canada’s parliamentary system. on Should or British that in > senior th health iré units surance gnificant aw, life ire the sue Life inly see > words lers if mpany. npanies . life of inate a ryment urance 1? » Spy) ; best ‘archy fo the RED WS: nally be st 4 be be up par nt of ne ‘4 oN Ee CANADA PARTY MEMBERS WANT KEALEY AS LEADER Please contact Glen Kealey at (604) 743-2407 and state your personal opinion on this matter fo. a IAA er - * ef) ener. a 4 Vols Cote awa t so) rf, e \' ’ "we RP @eiP eee KI Li Pt f. has : il ci ba r 7 a ™ - i - P = © } ae th i - i] I = i # in be = a \- . sm Hh. - “— = BACKGROUND Greg Krawchuk, the current Manitoba President of the Canada Party contacted Glen Kealey following a meeting sponsored by the Canadian Institute for Political Integrity on behalf of the Assembly of Independent Canadians, in Winnipeg, Manitoba. Mr. Krawchuk asked Kealey to run as Leader of the CANADA PARTY at the next convention to be held in Ottawa, in late July 1996. Kealey suggested that if other members of the Board of the CANADA PARTY agreed with Krawchuk he should request that they write to Kealey, on CANADA PARTY letterhead and formalize their position. The CANADA PARTY letter which appears on the right was received by Glen \ , Kealey subsequent ta Win ssamsater sir te The KEALEY PAPER is reprinting the CANADA PARTY directors response exactly as received. We request that each supporter of CIPI and the AIC personally contact Glen by telephone as soon as possible to state their views on the matter. CANADA PARTY positions follow below. PREAMBLE The Canada Party 1s not based on, nor the Canada Party regardless is welcome to join The purpose of the the full measure of freedom, pros responsibility sovereignty over right to the Canadian govern > mings is werceme-te ruins - ee CANADA PARTY CONSTITUTION Canada Party is to build perity and security that comes with it. This can only be ac - the issue of all currenc “i ment through the British North America Act, Section 91. i+] The cas da Party Direct Democracy Voters Inkiailve Aelerendum & Recall Box 321, Peachland, B.C. Canada VOH 1X0 March 3, 1996 Dear Mr. Glen Kealy; As per discussions held with Mr. Greg Krawchuk on March 2, 1996 in Regina, Saskatchewan, a motion was made at our Board meeting that the Board contact you regarding the following- The Canada Party Board would like toe invite you to become a member of our Canada Party as it is in need of someone with your organi- zgational abilities. Fnclosed is a copy of our Party Constitution along with a member— ship registration form. A copy of our Policies and By-Laws will al- so be mailed to you as soon as possible. Our Party will be filling all executive positions at our next con- vention, which we hope will take place in Eastern Canada no later than the Fall of 1996. Any member of the Canada Party. in geod stan- "ih 4 Yours truly, Le. QJeclay i Jocelyne Shannon Canada Party Secretary Board members are: Se Farlie Paynter, Jocelyne ~iair Fosse. David Weston, Cecil Schnurr, saa geet, « [Irene Armishaw, Greg Krawchuk, Joe Thauberger, Shannon, Roy Lyall, : . | ogers, Jack Hopkins Atlanta Braley, Grenville k supports any specific religion, therefore any Canadian of ethnic heritage, race or religion. a democratic society in which all of its citizens have that this nation can provide, as well as the complished when the nation has complete y and credit, which in Canada is provided by giving that continued on page 4 THE KEALEY PAPER Issue4 * March/April 1996 haa Cees » ee + oe ee : —- Py TT CI tok Kil hy hia! bane oe hi al ab ae oe oe a ee J i a | bh bed et Ale a 4 , yf - yr oF ay i r eee es bear ey eee ee~ iM, Nc eS SSERD SORES RES SS PTT PUR VU ERAAA AAA AES. ‘ WervePEehataaerear i , rere ‘rer eles eae ‘a cane te 1 fh TO ppp eters fe ! et Seep ee ae —_— j P a a 2 i a 1:1. The official name of the organization will be the Canada Pa Te a eileen 1:2 For the purposes of this Constitution and its Bylaws the organizan™ aie Ta. ARTICLE 2. FUNDAMENTAL BELIEFS 4-1 True democracy can only be enjoyed when government is of, by and for t ne peor = rs ne accountable to them at all times. To ensure true democra cy m - a, we them of the fund amental policies of: com> pete, | om mn = —_—— a i accessible and committed to the constitutional entrenchment i Recall of Representatives and appointed officials; “a . Binding Referenda; . Voters’ Initiative; Free Votes in Parliament, and Set Election Dates. 2:2. The will of the majority by Binding Referenda must take precedence over any government, any monarchy ASSES representatives, any court, any international organization over the Party policy of any elected represen ative, 2:3 Canada must completely retain its economic, political. and social soyereignby,as aA MAtOm 9 votleine 1 ‘1 9:4 The Canadian Constitution must stipulate the fundamental right of the people to own, retain and enjoy both real and personal property and.to use it responsibly within the democratic laws of Canada, AND the absolute fr a al action (exempting those actions which infringe upon the rights of others). m. bt House of Commons. The Prime Minister must be elected by the /she will go back to the Cabinet. However, until the proporfionat a >-5 Ultimately, the Cabmet must be elected by the Cabinet for a term of one year only, following which he voting (2) or transferra ble ballot system is in use during e | mandate to:govern, only the elected members of the governing P entire House of Commons will elect the Cabinet. = * i. a lections, thus ensuring a government with a true mye ey ane arty will elect the Cabinet. After this is legisla r= bi Ser. * — nadian people will totally control the Bank of Canada and issue a oo we a c iy ° ran? ain< 4 . (‘a ie 7-6 The Federal government on be half of the Can | ; | : "a Canadian money supply as is stipulated in the B.N.A. Act - Sect.91, Clause 14. All private financial and banking = ee 7 en T > - 7 . 4 om , +» 4 . h hit d. i. os re = aE. i tyP pee +i} ‘nvolvement in government finance must be entirely eliminated and pronibite e it is ; 3 # i . yee ~ __ Se ae. 9-7 The Canada Party will put the chartered banks backs on the reserve system and work towards 100% rese ve. y within the Party will be enj oyed by its members. The Party ITSELF will therefore operate up 1 2:8 True democrac | the principles of Binding Referenda, Members Initiatives and Recall of Party Representatives. “7 2:9 Inorder to protect the foundation principles of the Party, as of October 30th, 1994: “i al le . - undamental Beliefs and Purpose must not be altered in a r te these sections or subsections, ns or subsections under the Articles of F a) all sections = way; that is to say, it is not allowable to subtract from nor dele ais b) nor silat any further subsection or sections be added to this document or the Bylaws, or to he P oe Party, if they contradict or diminish in any way thy micartiig and/or Loner of the ori; : nal subse - te ar i sect as of the above date. — - : — = 7” = =a, | i —, = te = = ie =— <<, 4 = aa re a” Bi = J 7 a " + dal aaa) ae ih 2 1 — = | 7 = a a i om | i ee. . e a eee ee — —_= = —_— =" rea : = r = = ; a 7a > 4 Ree re PEAR a al LCA LY SARE aE gf SPY we ae a I . 3 re PNAS A 1 hen (RA Oe ee Ve et » PF! - arg | es | 2 = F \ | Te y on’ Pi 4 NY Iald i WS RW ial Dia al | i 1 oa Ty al) i..* 4h 4 Ly he | a | “i ' ® 3:1 The purpose of the Party is: to inform the people of Canada regarding the import: Voter’s Initiatives and Banking Reform as tools to achieve unity, prosperity and freedom. 3:2 To elect enough representatives to the Parliament of Canada in order that the pre -eding funda nent be legislated. 3:3 The Party will promote the policies developed by its Policy and Platform Committee. Th developed and approved by the membership of the Party through democratic means. ARTICLE 4 COMMITMENT TO THE CANADIAN CONSTITUTION rovincial legislatures as clearly ! 1 October 3, the Supreme Court of Canada ruling, ber 18, 1995). 4:1 The division of powers between the federal parliament and the 91 and 92 of the British North America Act 1867, and confirmed by 1950, shall be adhered to. (Article 4 added and declared unalterable Novem ARTICLE 5 MEMBERSHIP 5:1. A thirty (30) day eligibility period must elapse before a new member can: a) vote at any meeting of the Party b)be nominated to run for the Party as an election candidate, ©) be chosen for any position or office in the Party. (In the case of a newly Association this provision may be waived with the approval of the Board) organized Riding or Provincial who wishes to hold a representative position within or for the Party must sign the Contract of Dedication. : ,* S:2 Anyone *See Schedule “A” attached. 5:3 All Canada Party policy must be presented to the members in referendum form for ratification or rejection. ARTICLE 6 LEADERSHIP REVIEW 6:1 The Party Leader will be elected at every Annual National Convention by all attending delegates in good standing. 6:2 As amember of the Party, the Leader/Interim Leader are also subject to the Recall procedure and to revocation of membership. 6:3 In order that the dictatorial leadership powers granted to all Party leaders by the Canada Elections Act may be overcome...all newly elected Leaders/Interim Leaders of the Party must sign a letter relinquishing signatory authority with the Elections Canada Office, once a new Leader is duly elected. This is to be signed immediately after his/her election/appointment as Leader and originals to be held by all organized Provincial Associations. * See Schedule ~B” attached. 6:4 If the position of Leader becomes vacant for any reason, an Interim Leader will be nominated by the Caucus, or the Board in the absence of a Caucus, subject to a simple majority of the Board. ARTICLE 7 CANDIDATES FOR NOMINATION 7:1 a) The Leader will sign all candidate’s Election registration certificates before the Nomination Day deadline if the Candidate has been duly nominated at a recognized Riding Association Nomination meeting; continued on page 8 THE KEALEY PAPER issue4 * March/April 4: i #7 al rely abate Teer) LT ed Me tet NS MAU / eo rei GF rey Ta are if ie sao ee ae - ——— f i oe — el — i oa i — = a ‘a ar i 2 | | > oe a DUE TO THE URGENCY OF THET Sk hs . eek 2 ee wo oe ry a er ee ee ee ee eee Eee Te ee ae ee ee, el ee ee a eae 1) | - q : i fr i | ; Le shy i | Lo a i" F rrievts *.F' 2 ) dy ri Ti PrP, * ete eS fe Rock would have you believe that he Is chasin ic the AIRBUS BRIBES in Switzerland. , & Bc H e knows the money was laundered ip Alberta. Why is he Paying his former law firm to prot Mulroney in Toront eee o? / ‘il 7 : / L Pe S THE “JUST-US SYSTEM” FOR TRY HERBIE” WILL NOT RETURN UNTIL MAY .’ ‘he d Ay! ra Ps > = as ae i" fl . 7 = &£ 4 i hr = + r 4 — ———— FP aa TT REL RE Ee hh i eo - 4 7 J - i + ai aa hp) _" ha 2 Mi a ey ' ci Peat he di” Bat Sit ANAS TAMA if un i ish Ca aie i Pe MER Py (yb - Pa ah Yr. BAB LAY il — a 2 + = made it illegal to | resources of =e @ & & QHeeePRPee bw & ALLITI )* * rat & i... ae! a fi.) 05, Pe FG PINION the Board. a) Donations will be accepted only from individuals b) Donations from corporations, special interest gr 8-3 All Schedules attached are part of and included in the Party Constitution. &ie - wy ue "el, ey el i he, a iy ech We WO a ' ’ ~ a AA 7 | SeGcee AGLiat vhs ' RAS ERRAR AA LAA AUS eh AS) : | iy oe ee, es, ee, ry, Fa he te Va hes Vs Os ; la Fi A dl ' ’ i 1"hy b) In the absence of a candidate duly nominated by a recognized | id sign the election registration certificate of a candidate, pending a fifty (50) percent plus one majon™, vo ARTICLE 8 GENERAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS 8:1 Atno time, nor at any level of Party organization is it allowable or to any individual unless that individual signs a waiver beforehand not be made until the Party can financially withstand same. 8:2 Inorder to protect the grass roots principles of the Party: oups, labour unions or banks will not be accep ted. OWA WRN ARES Ly pat TA iv/ if? sary oe CMe S Oe OT ERELESOS ’ NAASRADES a Sos SR he > vadvedy Peery Sabb wari sis At i! ayaa .4 ‘J : AA Pat ods 4B & BU SBT ha& L i E “7. "| i 4 : i « J to go into debt to any lending institution OF 58" stating that he/she acknowledges that paymem= ™ a =. Paes 8-4. The Canada Party is committed to the fundamental right of the people to the freedom of belief and fre e dom of religion. ARTICLE 9 AMENDING FORMULAE 9:1 Amendments percent majority vote, Article 3 Purpose and Article 4 Co 9:2 Amendments to the Bylaws of th 9:3. The Bylaws of the Party contain operative details in support of this Constitution. that this Constitution and its Bylaws do not provide will be tabled and voted on by the action is taken. SCHEDULE “B” (See Article 5:2) CONTRACT of DEDICATION As I make my bid / accept nomination to hold a representative position in or for the Party.... I affirm my dedication to the principles found in the Party Constitution under Article 2 - Fundamental Beliefs, Article 3 - Purpose, Article 4 - Commitment to the Canadian Constitution. I acknowledge that if and when I am found by the Party to no longer support Article 2,3 or 4 of the Canada Party Constitution, my membership shall be terminated. SIGNED DATE Printed Name WITNESS Printed Name Page8 THEKEALEY PAPER Issue4 * March/ April 1996 e Party and to Party Police will be approved at Annual National Conventions of the Pacty, be a two thirds (2/3) majority vote of duly elected and attending delegates. SCHEDULE ae G3 (See Article 6:3) RESIGNATION (ee (present Interim Leader / Leader of the Canada Party) to this Consitution will be approved only at National Conventions of the Party by a seventy-five (/3° h) of duly elected and attending delegates. (Keeping in mind that Article 2 Fundamental eliefs mmitment to the Canadian Constitution are UNALTERABLE.) is ot = . Any matter requiring guidance Board before any decision or do hereby relinquish my signatory authority (regarding the registration of the Leader of the Party with Elections Canada Office) to the newly appointed / elected Party Interim Leader / Leader, pursuant to nomination of interim Leader as per Party : Constitution, or to the holding of a National Convention, duly . called by the Executive of the Party and the election of the new Party Leader. Pe ela Printed Name WITNESS The newly appointed Interim Leader / elected Leader as per ‘On Party’s National Nomination Meeting / Convention held on “ts acid is now: | — 2 INTRODUCTION by Ann Kealey Because of its relevancy to the Kealey Paper's article on Pd Euthanasia and Insurance | companies and its mention of Glen Kealey — we have reprinted most of Joyce Nelson’s article "DT. Rockefeller will see you now” which appeared last year, in the January- February 1995. .-issue- of ‘Canadian Forum” magazine. Within days of federal Finance Minister Paul Martin’s mid-October announcement that $9.4 billion will have to be raised over the next two - years, through either higher taxes or ; spending cuts, in order to meet his deficit-reduction target date, the C.D. Howe Institute urged Martin to cul federal spending even deeper and faster. The private think-tank called for $14.8 billion in cuts over the next two years by virtually eliminating all federal spending on health care, while cutting drastically into spending on unemployment insurance, post- secondary ¢ducation, welfare and old- age security payments. Ihe need for such radical surgery was quickly endorsed by much of the mainstream media, which called the Institute’s diagnosis “realistic” and “fine”, What the media neglected, however, to add was that since 1976 the C.D. Howe Institute has been closely connected to David Rockefeller’s Trilateral Commission, whose 300-plus members (primarily presidents and CEO’s of global corporations, bankers, politicians and a few academics) comprise the most powerful and elite organization for world planning known to exist. Within days of Human published in the October 22 Financial Post, found “Strong public support” for Axworthy’s proposals. When the poll’s findings were picked up by Canadian Press the following day, the Anonymous CP reporter (likely writing with press release in hand) claimed: .“The Poll provides ammunition for the Liberals in their fight with provinces and interest froups over changing social programs. lt suggests Ottawa could go ahead with some changes on its own, knowing it has public support.” That same evening, as Globe and Mail columnist Kick Salutin has noted, the _ poll provided the lead story fer Nike Da fy? o> CIV show and had the host “squirming with delight. It showed that if vou ask Canadians whether people on welfare should have to work or just get paid fo. Sitting around, Canadians are ready to Cul * “i Ly “. te! 4 rt } Axworthy himself served on the j | sail ij _ 27 Indication that there is an ippetite for ChRaAaAnePe AMG that LanhaAGgIARS are prepared (oO taKe aA LOOK al SOME FEW deans Ne one bothered to inform the public that of Executive Consultants Ltd... an Ottawa lobbying firm owned by the world’s biggest PR firm, New York- based giant Burson-Marsteller—whose Canadian chairman, Allan &. Gotlieb, is the North American Deputy Char of the rilateral Commission. Come to think of it, no one has informed the public that, according to the Canadian Institute for Political Infegrity’s Ottawa founder Glen Kealey—credited by author Stevie Cameron for successfully bringing fraud charges against former Cabinet minister Roch LaSalle—Paul Martin was hand- picked to be finance minister by Liberal Party adviser Mitchell Sharp, who joined the Trilateral Commission in 1977 and was Deputy Chair of the Commission during the 1980's. Obviously, it’s high time for another look at the Trilateral Commission and Burson-Marsteller, who are well-hidden but key players in the Resources Minister Lloyd Axworthy’s effort to PRIVATIZE CANADA’S federal green paper proposing HEALTH CARE SYSTEM, a system comprehensive “reforms” to Canada’s _ that has been called “one of the largest social safety net, a curious poll made unopened oysters in the Canadian headlines across the country. The poll, economy.” Burson-Marsteller; (B-M), conducted by COMPAS Inc. and first with branch plant offices in Montreal, The hidden players privatizing 1 . Canada’s health care system Ottawa, Toronto and Vancouver, and the Trilateral Commission (TC) are intent on fully prying open that oyster, which is potentially worth billions to the private health care sector - especially the private insurance industry. U.S. consumer advocate Ralph Nader warned Canadians in a December 1992 OTTAWA speech that the goal of ihe giant health care industries in the U.S. is “to subvert if not destroy both the compulsory pricing system for drugs and elements of the universal health .wspranse-sysieny) ant awadn, - yyiress cccet £0 . OV ire FC member Billi Chinton Oysters Rockefeller Lecording to Holly Sklar, who edited the book Trilateralism, the TC in the 1990's is “more powerful than ever”. One oarticular factor in the TC’s current ver is that ever since Allan Gotlieb (Canada’s ambassador the U.S. from iSSl to 193838) joined both the Trilateral (ommussion and global giant Burson- Viarsteller in 1989, B-M has increasingly functioned as a PR/lobbying arm of the iC itself. This corporate cooperation was especially apparent in the powertul duo’s orchestration of NAFTA’s passage (see Dec..93 Canadian Forum). \ccording to the most recent figures available, B-M (which has 62 offices in 29 countries) was paid nearly $18 muillion for getting NAFTA signed, sealed and delivered. The Chretien government — which has broken election promises regarding NAFTA, Clayoquot Sound and the lobbying industry — appointed Trilateralist Roy MacLaren, the Liberal Party’s most vociferous advocate of NAFTA, as International Trade Minister. Since NAFTA has crucial implications for Canadians’ health care system, it’s not surprising that the same corporate superpowers are heavily engaged in the whole health-care issue in Canada, as they have been for years in the U.S. The late 1980’s populist push in the U.S. for a_ single-payer/universal system modelled on Canada’s health care system prompted the U.S. Congress to appoint in 1988 a Bipartisan Commission on Comprehensive Health Care, whose mandate was to suggest “reforms” to American health care. © ~~ ° continuedon page 10 THE KEALEY PAPER Issue4 * March/April1996 Page 9 ore : 2 / 7 m = tL q Fu . | ' Spake ery 4 VUE TEV FLV TI | ts antes ms is eaves sey | LAS ee as Seve) eeWN ee NAN Vi At the time, 35 million U.S. citizens had no health insurance coverage at all. The Commission, chaired by TC member John D. Rockefeller IV, released its report in 1990 (after the signing of the Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement) and urged employment- based private insurance coverage. As Senator Rockefeller explained to the business community: “Employer- mandated coverage is the last resort we have against the establishment of a national health program that neither you nor I want.” was elected U.S. president im 1992, he quickly appointed TC member Donna E. Shalala as U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services, along with 13 other TC members to key cabinet and administrative posts. Perhaps not surprisingly, the President’s Health Care Task Force, chaired by Mrs. Clinton, rejected any approach not based on private insurance — a $300 billion industry in the U.S. According to U.S. health care activist Townsend Walker, of the Alabama Health Education & Action League, “The Clinton Administration’s so-called ‘reforms’, based on ‘managed competition’, were intended nght from the first to benefit the big insurance companies, many of which are directly linked to the Rockefeller Group of financial holdings, including Metropolitan Life, Equitable Life and New York Life.” Metropolitan Life, whose Canadian operations are based in Ottawa and Toronto, has been a Burson-Marsteller client for more than a decade. In 1993, at the height of the lobbying turbulence surrounding both health care and NAFTA in the U.S., B.-M’s insurance clients included Met Life, Equitable Life, Aetna and State Farm. Both Met Life and State Farm continue to be B-M clients. Now that health care legislation is dead in the water in the U.S., the primary beneficiaries of all the chaos and turmoil have been the pharmaceutical giants (11 of whom are current B-M clients) and “the Big Five” private insurers: Met Life, Aetna, Prudential, Cigna and The , eee Travelers — vertically integrated = AA See +ELOER ABE BS i ae a i oe - Yat ¥ = ay Se Fe =e ADLER LSA SD. iat SN VAS V2 hee &: aenuae ‘ 7 Vy? AM) bRRLAAY ™ @ i. | ANALYSIS DR. continued from page 9 health care behemoths who own and operate huge chains of HMOs (health maintenance organizations) ready to provide every service on the medical spectrum, for a price. While the number of U.S. citizens without health insurance coverage has risen to 39 million, HMO membership is already 50 million. The HMO insurers, paid to provide coverage for companies’ employees, don’t have to cover all ilinesses or all people but can pick and choose those likely to need the least medical care as a cost-saving measure. As a writer for the Nation has observed, “The same insurance industry that brought us ‘redlining’ by disease and ‘cherry picking’ of healthy people in order to increase profits, is now to be catapulted into the role of ‘CARING’ PROVIDER.” Learning from the “Debate” According to O’Dwyer’s PR Services, a U.S. company that closely tracks the activity of PR/Aobbying firms, as well as the fees paid to them, Burson-Marsteller played the leading role in the U.S. health care “debate” — the most lucrative PR and lobbying bonanza in history O'Dwyer *s editor Ac ven rice aulc say > (iat during: the years 1992 and ‘{993, “BIW earned $81.2 Million just on its health care PR billings” — at least three times more than its closest competitor, Hill & Knowlton. “B-M is a big outfit and they are by far the leaders tn health care lobbying.” XXXXxXXXXXXXxX B-M has its own specialized unit called Burson-Marsteller Healthcare, which McCauley says provides clients with “consumer and professional marketing; issues/crisis management government relations; constituency relations; media training; media relations; media design; and advertising”. On behalf of its numerous and powerful clients — which in 1993 included the Health Leadership Council (comprising more than 55 corporations with a stake in the health care industry) — B-M was central to blocking the populist push for a health care system modelled on Canada’s. As any Canadian viewer of U.S. TV will recall, much of the U.S. “debate” involved the trashing of Canada’s health care system with scare-tactic stories about lengthy waiting times for emergency care, the inability of Canadians fo choose our own doctors, the seeming unavailability of medical procedures like bone marrow transplants, and even the “illegality” of o r Canadian seniors. Michael Rachhis, M.D., and Carol Kushner, Canadian authors of the 1994 book Strong Medicine say this tactic was meant “to keep Americans confused about public insurance” and note that “both the American Medical Association and the insurance industry have spent "age 10 THE KEALEY PAPER Issue 4 * On June 7, 1994, Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR) took out a page in the New York Times to inform the public that the point- counterpoint duo appearing regularly on National Public Radio’s “Morning Edition” to debate the health care issue were actually both paid lobbyists for the same side: Tom Downey, a lobbyist for Met Life, and Vin Weber, paid by the Alliance for Managed Competition, the “Big Five” insurers group that includes Met Life. FAIR suggested this was “just one more sign that commercial health interests have succeeded in subverting the biggest public policy debate in the last 50 years. Now a similar, if more subtle, discrediting process is under way here, with Canadians as the target. The first steps are to undermine the public’s confidence in the Canadian system, especially through deficit-mania, and to cause confusion. As Canadian health care activist and film-maker Laura Sky explains, “In the business world it’s called ‘the chaos theory of market restructuring. There is a value in creating chaos if you want to rcormrnose and capture «2 market. sumcl im our: case, the:Canadian- health-care. system is being thrown into chaos so ~ that private interests can step in and provide ‘solutions’.” CANADIAN TE RILATERALIST Michel Belanger Jacques Bougie* Conrad Black Bernard Bonin Claude Castonguay Marshall Cohen* David Culver Paul G. Desmarais* Louis Desrocher Marie Josee Drouin* Trevor Eyton* L. Yves Fortier* Allan E. Gotlieb* Donald S. Harvie David Hennigar* Michael Kirby Alan B. Hockin Donald S. Macdonald Roy MacLaren* Darcy McKeough Arne R. Neilson James Pattison* Ronald D. Southern *Current members of the Trilateral Commission March / April 1996 Dir. Dur. Dir. Dir. Dir. Dir. Aetna Life Dir. Royal Insurance Co. MAA mie: i i Leahy ASUS eas RRRRRVALAS OS ‘aL eD'S ah, SO Sf PUSASVLANL YES ‘SANDAL what’s called mec dia plat om ‘ . 5: m. getting mews items favoura client's interests into — . its prospective clients ‘that ee ‘can “manage issues by influencing rhe the right combination — public attitudes, public perceptions, public behaviour and public policy”. It is that last item, public policy, that is crucial, especially with nowerfel groups like the C.D. Lowe Institute. leaning on the Liberals to cut federal health care spending entirely — a move that would undermine the Canada Health Act. According - f0- Colleen Fuller of the Health Sciences Association of British Columbia, “The - ability of U.S. health insurers to participate in the Canadian ‘market’ is totally dependent on the serious erosion or outright elimination of the Canada Health Act”, which specifically excludes private, for-profit administration of health insurance. The erosion is already under way as the provinces, faced with steady cuts in federal transfer payments under two Tory governments, begin fo de-list medical services previously covered by public insurance plans — a decision that Rachlis and Kushner say “could throw patients into the arms of the private insurance industry”. The C.D ens Rawwse Levertides@c cowebrst a > abs a protdss,$# i cure taneital ne Chaos, and Howe PRIVATE INSURANCE CONNECTION Commercial Group Insurance Great Lakes Reinsurance Munich Reinsurance Canada Munich Life Management Confederation Life (1991-93) Laurentian General Insurance International Advisory Council: American Insurance Group American Express Great-West Life Insurance (Owned by Power Corp) Dir. Standard Life Dir. London Life Dir. Manufactureres Life (1993) Chair: Burson-Marsteller Canada Chair: Crownx Vice-Chair: Crown Insurance Dir. Crombie Insurance (UK) Chair: Senate Banking Committee Dir, Crownx Dir. London Life Insurance London Insurance Group Dir, Sun Life Assurance Co. Dir. London Insurance Group es es a a ee Wea a FS, Nei 14S SER MAMAS VATA EDS Cy Shee RAPES PE ER bi SS Pee EY ES EDY? contracted cle ee 3 in hopes of s orders for Diver: a sanitation reduc ~1 ecl uris F VE aw t ar La = —— = -_ a af ie . , ‘ih be i + i Institute member NV former federal minister of bce th Canada-America Committee. 1 des Fe also Chair of Hotel-Dieu in Montre mae ran a director of Citibank, which is 0 wned by Citicorp—the financial core of t Rockefeller empire. Citicorp has b Burson-Marsteller client since 1991. PP ff _ The ert: aeiert Dire Hoy Be ns i - ALD eRe Zim her vey 1 a i 7e Sick patina and” condneeee on n page + - Soe Dir. National Bank of Canada Dir. Royal Bank Dir. CIBC Deputy Governor Bank of Canada | Chair: Laurentian Trust ans Dir. TD Bank | ; ~ _ ay" : e Pes CIBC - tN elt Dir. Royal Trustco ae Dir. Royal Bank — 2 Bin Bask of Monnaie “oy Chair: Senate Banking € = = = Fy aw The hidden players privatizing Canada’s health care system continued from page 10 and a director for Confederation Life. » with Simon Reisman, Canada’s free trad p the negotiator, is on the Executive Committ e of the of the Institute and is President se = Ottawa’s Trade and Investment Advisory Sea Group. Thomas E. Kierans, the President eutis and CEO of the C.D. Howe Institute, is on tae the board of Manufacturers Life and, hall during the 1990's, has been “Special sine Policy Advisor” to the Ontario ssc government. in st In B.C., former Social Credit oe health minister Jim Nielsen has recently ro opened the province’s first private MRI ae (magnetic resonance imagery) clinic, charging $595 to $1,000 per MRI scan to a people who don’t want to wait for an = appointment at one of the province’s . four publicly run MRI clinics. Ze | In ALBERTA, where Premier dd | Ralph Klein has called for increased private enterprise in the health system, : and has cut thousands of public-sector i health care jobs, the private Gimbel s clinics offer surgery covered by S Medicare, but charge patients an extra H “facility fee”, such as the $1,000 fee for a : cataract operation. The Reform Party - has defended such private clinics and has questioned in the House of Commons whether or not the federal government, having eroded transfer payments, still has the authority to uphold the Canada Health Act. During the election campaign, the Reform Party was advised by PR pros from both Burson-Marstelier and Hill and Knowlton, the top PR firms in the world, who between them represent 103 private health care clients. In 1992, the Ontario government, faced with shrinking health care budgets like the rest of the provinces, decreed that q the province’s 223 publicly funded hospitals must find ways to cut costs and become more “efficient™ — pushing hospitals to merge, make radical changes in the way health care is delivered, or close. In May of 1994, the Metro Toronto District Health Council, a provincial sovernment advisory body, appointed a nine-member committee to decide the fate of Metro Toronto’s 44 hospitals — the largest hospital restructuring project in the world. The Hospital Restructuring Committee (HRC) ts scheduled to release A third member of the ni member HRC is John C. Wilson: formerly of Ernst & Young and now E private consultant, who led the recent restructuring” of Ontario Hydro that since 1993, has resulted in Dearly 12,000 job cuts at the Crown corporation. Given that Ontario Hydro was a Burson-Marsteller client in 1993, Wilson must have worked closely with B-M in the process now widely acknowledged as a major step towards privatization. Maurice Strong, head of Ontario Hydro, joined the Trilateral Commission in 1976. From 1990 to 1992, Strong worked closely with B-M in planning for gobal bussiness’s involvement in the 1992 Rio Earth Summit. HRC member Wilson is also the Founding Chairman of the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CAIR) — a think-tank funded by the federal and Ontario governments, as well as a handful of blue-chip} corpor-ations~ such = as Manufacturers Life, listed as a “primary benefactor of CAIR and the funding initiator of CAIR’s Program in Population Health, which generously funds research fellowships ($1,000,000/year for S years) and scholarships ($50,000/year for 5 years) for 18 university CAIR scholars four of. whom. have been “appointed to *s« National Forum on Health. ( hreticn Since the Forum’s mandate ts to consult with experts across the country , we might consider what happened during a similar process for the Royal Commission on New Reproductive Technologies (1989- 1993). In February 1992 the National Action Committee for the Status of Women went public with its finding that the Commission had contracted two Burson-Marsteller professionals to advise it on the biotechnology industry and on which interest groups to consult. B-M has its own Biotech- nology PR Unit to assist long-term clients like Sandoz and Genentech, as well as a host of pharmaceutical giants. With private sector interests heavily involved in both the largest Pe ee ar ie ee ie if 7 a c . ‘| sectors are filled with Canadian Trilateralists, as the sidebar indicates. Based on spring 1994 sources, the listings reveal TC presence in the financial sector just at the time behind- closed doors decisions were being made on whether or not to pull the plug on Confederation Life — the largest insurance company failure in North America. While the mainstream business press was filled through the summer of 1994 with high drama and speculation about the impending fate of Confederation Life, especially a possible last-minute rescue of Confed led by (TC member) Paul Desmarais’s Great West Life, no one bothered to inform the public that, since 1993, one of the directors of Desmarais’s Power Financial Corps, has been Edward Ney — the U.S. head of Burson-Marsteller’s 7% = — [= — ft - re i Py ie ua ‘ ‘ee Ss) j a or ad Poh ' we * bad cabal A | hes Mate sled! a A 1 rapvrae ty 7 ee sih‘or 7 -_ /* i- & ) oa he i’ aS i Say 5 i 7 2k nna Ae eo By te ithe he Sythe a eS ils rn, FF , \s even bigger operators would then be this: the private insurers and the banks together have their eye on the lucrative bonanza locked up in Canada’s public health insurance system. As Colleen Fuller reminds ous, Insurance companies, who call themselves avid free traders, have been active at all trade tables (the FTA, NAFTA and GATT), pushing hard for worldwide liberalized trade in financial services’.” While the press typically treats them as competitors, the banks and the insurance companies are quietly cooperating to pry open that Canadian health care “oyster”. At the same time, the insurance companies have been lobbying, under the leadership of parent company and B-M’s international adviser. Throughout Ney’s tenure as U.S. Ambassador to Canada (1989- 1992), the press neglected to identify Ney’s connection to Burson-Marsteller, or, for that matter, the B-M connection between Ney and Gotlieb. Such silence was. of course, useful for the passage of NAFTA. Since 1993, a similar press silence has surrounded Ney’s involvement in Power Financial Corps. Kenneth Kidd’s article “Life Preserver” for Report on Business (Oct.’94) informs us that Canada 1s “one of the most saturated insurance markets on the planet” wath $1.3 trillion in life insurance already owned by Canadians. “Confed’s collapse merely prefaces a massive shakeout in an industry plague by too many operators chasing too few customers.” Though Kidd doesn’t say it, the Great-West Life, to have taxpayer funding for their insurance fund, CompCorp. Calling for a “CDIC II”, they want an extension of the “safety net” federally provided to banks through the Canadian Deposit Insurance Corporation (CDIC) which has yet to pay back the $4.5 billion borrowed from the federal government ‘n 1991-92 to bail out the collapse af five of Canada’s largest trust companies. The Senate banking com- mittee, which has refused to lay blame in the Confed collapse, on November 23 stopped short of recommending a ; federally financed “CDIC HI” for the a private insurance sector, but called for } a system of “co-insurance” whereby i customers would assume some of the loss when an insurance company fails. WINNIPEG deposit broker, Tom Rice called the Senate’s report “an effort by an exclusive club to make the consumer the scapegoat”. Moreover, by November the CDIC answer to the dilemma is obvious: a two-pronged strategy that (a) decreases ihe number of operators, and (Db) introduces what are euphemistically being called “new product lines in Canada”. the biggest player is B-M client deficit and even maintain federal Metropolitan Life, which has transfer payments to the provinces. ‘announced agreement to acquire Butsuch “political will” is unlikely. The first prong is already under way, with Canada Life, North American Life, Sun Life, Great-West Life and Manufacturers Life all feeding on the Confed corpse, but also making other purchases in the industry. But had already forwarded $665 million to the National Bank to repay Confederation Trust’s insured dep- ositors. When that $5.1 billion hand- ed over to the CDIC is added to the $40 billion in deferred taxes currently owed by corporations, it’s clear just where the Chretien government might find the money it needs to reduce the its interim report mm January and its final report in June 1995. Since the HRC will have tremendous influence over the future of Metro hospitals, as well as the future of thousands of health care workers, it is amazing how little media coverage has hospital restructuring project in the world and the four-year, $14 million National Forum on Health, public policy “reforms” are being proposed just in time for some new/old players on the health care scene. It is also no coincidence that a significant number of hospital boards, in Toronto and Montreal, Allstate’s personal life insurance line, Confed’s group life and health business, and made a merger deal with The Travelers Inc. to create one of the largest health care HMO companies in North America, with 17,500 health care employees providing managed health care programs for 13 million people. In late November, Met Life announced an As I write, the Prime Minister of Canada is off to China, flacking for a number of Trilaterally- connected B-M_ clients, including Northern Telecom. Then Chretien ts off to visit another B-M client: the corrupt government of Indonesia. And when he returns, Chretien ts. been given to this project — especially because the composition of the nine- member committee Is controversial indeed. The Hospital Restructuring wiord — Committee chairperson is Ed Cra Chairman of the Canada Life Assurance Co. , Director of the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CIBC), and Trustee for Toronto’s Hospital for Sick Children. HRC member Richard rk. Lint Is President and CEO of Citibank and a director of Skandia Canada Reinsurance Co. A subsidiary of B-M client Citicorp, Citibank, Canada’s board members include Marc Lalonde — Latimer, Chair of Prudential. espec ially are peopled with Trevor Eyton is a director Sunnybrook Medical Centre; L. Yves Fortier —whose law firm, Ogilvy Renault, played a key role in getting the controversial drug patent extension Bill C-91 passed Insurance Coalition Perhaps not Trilateralists: Marshall Cohen is on the Advisory Councils of Mount Sinai Hospital and the Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care; for | surprisingly, de and Radcliffe Ganada’s insurance and banking agreement to acquire the Canadian of Travelers sroup life business Insurance, Thanks to the federal Tories, the 1992 Bank Act allows banks to buy insurance companies, so during the current feeding frenzy, the National Bank of Canada, CIBC, the Bank of Nova Scotia and the TD Bank are all buying up new insurance assets. The Bank Act is due to be revised in 1997 and the banks are hoping to permission to sell insurance products too. THE KEALEY PAPER Issue4 * March/April 1996 Pe scheduled to meet the new president of B-M’s client since 1990, the Mexican government. Who’s running Canada? It sure looks like it’s Burson-Marsteller and the Trilateral Commission. If so, we can kiss our public health care system goodbye. get a ——————— —— =— ir ama 44 te 6 af — aa =. Ti sami! | paneer iris a nt cipeyanee BEG as teat | +» Be a ——————_E———— =EMusrsh rll